Home
Take Action
Innocence
Links
Press Releases
FL Execution Information
Search
Get Involved
Local Groups
Reports
DP in the News
U.S. Execution Information
Yes Florida, There is an ALTERNATIVE to the Death Penalty

PRESS RELEASE
from
FLORIDIANS FOR ALTERNATIVES
TO THE DEATH PENALTY (FADP)

13 April 2005

CONTACT: Abe Bonowitz: 800-973-6548 / 561-371-5204

UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI RESEARCHERS FIND LETHAL INJECTION IS TORTURE

FADP raises concern about lethal injection process in light of medical journal report

April 13, 2005 – Floridians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty (FADP) today expressed concern over a medical journal report that suggests that in a significant number of cases, condemned prisoners are likely conscious as lethal drugs stop their heart and lungs from functioning, possibly suffering excruciating pain and suffocation.

Today a prestigious British medical journal, The Lancet, published an article authored by three University of Miami researchers and a Virginia death penalty lawyer - Leonidas G. Koniaris, Teresa A. Zimmers and David A. Lubarsky of the University of Miami School of Medicine and Virginia attorney Jonathan P. Sheldon.. The article suggests that some prisoners may be awake and able to feel pain during the execution process, despite the administration of sodium thiopental, which is designed to render a person unconscious while two other drugs are given.

The authors studied toxicology reports from 49 executed inmates – seven in Arizona, eight in Georgia, 11 in North Carolina and 23 in South Carolina. They found that 43 out of the 49 inmates had post-mortem blood thiopental levels below that required for surgery. And 21 inmates had levels consistent with awareness. “Thus,” the authors concluded, “lethal injection anesthesia methodology is flawed and some inmates might have experienced awareness and suffering during execution.”

“Amnesty International long ago declared that death row itself is torture," said Abe Bonowitz, director of Floridians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty. "Even before Timothy McVeigh shed a tear during his execution we have had suspicions that lethal injection is not as simple and painless as politicians would have us believe. This new report suggests that in many cases we are torturing prisoners to death by suffocation. We need an immediate time-out on executions until this research can be more fully verified and the ramifications considered."

In most states, lethal injection executions consist of administration of three drugs. First, sodium thiopental is administered to render the prisoner unconscious. Then, pancuronium bromide is administered to cause paralysis. Finally, potassium chloride is given to stop the heart, thus causing death. “Without anesthesia,” the authors write, “the condemned person would experience asphyxiation, a severe burning sensation, massive muscle cramping and finally cardiac arrest. Thus anesthesia is necessary both to mitigate the suffering of the condemned and to preserve public opinion that lethal injection is a near-painless death.”

************

And now the University of Miami release:
UM Researchers Question Lethal Injection as a Form of Capital Punishment

UM Researchers Question Lethal Injection as a Form of Capital Punishment

4/13/2005

A letter written by researchers at the University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine and published in The Lancet raises serious questions about lethal injection as a form of capital punishment. The letter in the April 16th edition of the prestigious international journal describes compelling evidence of inadequate anesthesia during executions.

Lethal injection generally consists of the sequential administration of sodium thiopental for anesthesia, pancuronium bromide to induce paralysis, and finally potassium chloride to stop the heart and cause death. Without anesthesia, the condemned person would experience suffocation and excruciating pain without being able to move or communicate that fact.

“Unlike in medical applications, anesthesia in execution has not been subjected to clinical trials or government regulation, nor have the practitioners received even basic training to do this,” says David A. Lubarsky, M.D., M.B.A., professor and chairman of the UM Department of Anesthesiology and one of the letter’s authors. “This caused us to wonder whether anesthesia methodology in lethal injection might be inadequate.”

The research team, which also included University of Miami faculty Teresa Zimmers, Ph.D., and Leonidas G. Koniaris, M.D., and Virginia attorney Jonathan Sheldon who specializes in the legal defense of the condemned, used a combination of state records obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, along with personal interviews and sworn testimony of corrections officials involved in executions in Virginia and Texas.

They also obtained autopsy toxicology results from 49 executions in Arizona, Georgia, North Carolina and South Carolina.

“The practice of lethal injection for execution perverts the tools of medicine and the trust the public has in drugs and clinical protocols. Although executioners use an anesthetic, the current dosages and means of administration do not assure that inmates are senseless to pain, particularly because inmates are not monitored for level of consciousness or depth of anesthesia,” said Leonidas G. Koniaris, M.D., associate professor of clinical surgery, cell biology and anatomy, and lead author of the letter.

“We found that 43 of 49 executed inmates had post-mortem blood anesthesia levels below that required for surgery, while 21 of those inmates had levels that were consistent with awareness,” said Teresa Zimmers, Ph.D., research assistant professor of surgery who analyzed the data for the research.

“This study provides strong evidence that anesthesia methodology in lethal injection is flawed and that some inmates likely experienced awareness and profound suffering during execution,” said Jonathan Sheldon. “While some think that the condemned deserve to suffer, our society long ago rejected the unnecessary infliction of pain in execution because it is contrary to our 8th Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.”

The researchers point out that physicians are ethically prohibited from participating in an execution, so adequate anesthesia cannot be assured by physicians actively overseeing the process. For that reason, they believe that until better protocols are developed and tested and those delivering the executions are better trained to assure it is performed in a humane and competent fashion, execution by lethal injection should be stopped to prevent unnecessary cruelty and suffering.

Media Contact: Jeanne Antol Krull
April 13, 2005
305-243-4853
jkrull@miami.edu

**********

SENT BY:

Abraham J. Bonowitz
Director

Floridians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty (FADP)
800-973-6548 www.fadp.org
PMB 335, 2603 NW 13th St (AKA Dr. MLK Jr. Hwy), Gainesville, FL 32609

Floridians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty works for restorative justice in the form of effective alternatives to the death penalty. It does so by

    # supporting and coordinating the work of organizations and individuals
    # educating and energizing the general public and state legislators
    # supporting the many persons affected by capital crime and punishment
    # advocating specific legislative improvements

abolitionist, stop capital punishment, abolish the death penalty, Alternatives to the death penalty
Floridians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty
PMB 335
2603 NW 13th St (AKA Dr. MLK Jr. Hwy)
Gainesville, FL 32609
(800) 973-6548
fadp@fadp.org
Copyright ©2005 FADP. All rights reserved.

FADP Home ] Top of Page ]
  Search our site for:  

Designed & Hosted by:    Support FADP and contact Computer Partners for Web Design & Hosting, eCommerce and Search Engine Optimization.